VehiclesECX Ruckus 1/18 4WD

ECX

ECX Ruckus 1/18 4WD

1/18 scale · monster truck · ECX01000

Final drive
10.60:1
Tire
75mm
ECX Ruckus 1/18 4WD
Photo: Horizon Hobby

Specifications

Last modified

SpecValueBasis
Drivetrain
Pinion14TStockStock
Spur60TStockStock
Transmission & axle2.47:1StockStock
Spur ÷ pinion4.286:1CalculatedCalculated
Final drive10.60:1StockStock
Wheels & tires
Tire diameter75mmStockStock
Rollout22.3mm per motor turnCalculatedCalculated
Power
MotorNot applicable
Motor shaft2.5 mmStockStock
BatteryNot published
Performance
Theoretical top speedNot applicable
Vehicle
Part numberECX01000
Scale1/18
ClassMonster truck

Stock is as the vehicle ships. Calculated is worked from the stock figures on this page rather than stored beside them, so the two cannot drift apart. Not applicable means the vehicle does not come with it, like the motor on a roller or the tires on a race kit, or does not have one, like a KV rating on a brushed motor. Not published means it exists but no source we could find prints it.

Gearing parts

Pinion and spur parts for the ECX Ruckus 1/18 4WD: fitted, and optional gearing supplied in the box
ComponentTeethPitchBorePart number
Fitted at the factory
Pinion14TMod 0.5Not publishedECX212002 (opens in a new tab)
Spur60TMod 0.5Not applicableECX212002 (opens in a new tab)

Tooth counts are the ones in the specifications above. Pitch is given as metric module (Mod 1, Mod 0.8) or diametral pitch (32P, 48P). They are different standards and are not interchangeable, even where the numbers look close. Bore is the pinion’s hole, listed separately from the motor shaft (2.5 mm on the stock motor). Linked part numbers go to the maker's or official distributor's page for that part.

How these numbers were settled

Horizon's spec table prints a 14T pinion, a 60T 0.5 module spur, a 2.47 internal gear ratio, a 10.60 final drive and a 2.95in (75mm) outer tire diameter; 60/14 x 2.47 = 10.59 agrees with the printed total.

Documents

Sources

Every figure on this page traces to one of these. Where they disagreed, the note above says which was used and why.

More from ECX